The mesothread facelift procedure is one of the most controversial of our time. A group of scientists from the University of Albany (Albany Medical College) conducted their own independent study to determine all the advantages and disadvantages of the threadlift procedure.
Target
Evaluation of the long-term results of a threadlift procedure for facial rejuvenation.
Methods
Thirty-three patients underwent a facelift with mesothreads alone (10 patients), or in combination with other facial rejuvenation procedures (eyebrows, midface, mandibular line and neck) - 23 patients. An additional control group was also created, consisting of 10 patients who received other non-invasive facial rejuvenation procedures, including lipoplasty, chemical peels and rhytidectomy. The median follow-up was 21 months (range 12–31 months). Each patient visit was documented (with photographs).
Long-term aesthetic outcomes were evaluated by 4 independent board certified plastic surgeons. Each result was rated on a scale of 0 to 3, with 0 indicating no change; 1 - minimal improvement, 2 - moderate improvement, 3 - significant improvement. For comparison, patients were divided into 3 groups. For statistical analysis of aesthetic results, a two-tailed T-test was used (p=0.05). Results Although aesthetic improvement was noted in all groups at 1 month, measurable results persisted at the end of the study for all groups except for the one that used the threadlift technique alone. Aesthetic scores for improving the appearance of the skin in the 3rd control group were also much higher than in the 1st. The same applies to the 2nd group of patients, who, in addition to the procedure of mesothreads, underwent other facial rejuvenation procedures. Statistical significance was demonstrated in both of these comparisons (P<0.01).
Conclusions
Mesothreads provide only limited short-term improvement in skin condition, which can be largely attributed to the effects of the procedure, such as swelling and inflammation. Our results demonstrate the absence of pronounced long-term results after the procedure. Given these results, and the measurable risks of adverse effects and patient discomfort, we cannot justify the continued use of this procedure for facial rejuvenation. Study Authors: Rima F. Abraham, Robeth J. DeFatta, Edwin F. Williams III
Source: estet-portal.com.
Add a comment